Alaska Science Forum
October 16, 1991Article #1052
by Carla Helfferich
This column is provided as a public service by the Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, in cooperation with the UAF research community. Carla Helfferich is a science writer at the institute.
Back when science fiction was first hustling to keep ahead of science fact,
some tales featured the medical possibilities of near zero-gravity conditions.
Surely humans would thrive once they could get away from the wearying, unceasing
pull of Earth. Hearts wouldn’t have to pump so hard not muscles strain
against gravity. Perhaps, some authors speculated, brains would work better
too.
It’s beginning to look as if healthy space living has gone the way
of boating on Martian canals. Fiction is being replaced by more disagreeable
fact.
Though the health of astronauts has been of great concern since the days
when only dogs or apes were sent into space, intensive biomedical studies
have played a fairly small part in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s
efforts. According to Science magazine, the space shuttle mission completed
this past June was the first major life sciences project flown by NASA since
1974. Animals studied aboard the flight were 2000 jellyfish, 29 rats—and
seven humans.
Preliminary results of the studies were given at a briefing in mid-September.
They don’t make encouraging reading for someone who’s dreamed
of an eventual vacation on Mars.
The physiological changes brought about by weightlessness appear quickly.
The classic effects of space travel—those noted before by American
and Soviet spacefarers—include shift of blood volume from the legs
to the upper torso, increased heart rate, reduced intake of food and drink,
and decrease in plasma volume.
The effect that immediately bothers astronauts is motion sickness. All
but one of the crew on the June flight suffered from the nausea that much
of humankind feels on a rolling boat or in a jouncing car. Two-thirds of
the people who have flown in space have felt motion sickness, some to the
point of virtual incapacitation.
The theory explaining motion sickness assumes it comes from conflicting
signals. An astronaut can see that he or she is in a stable position and
can touch and feel the deck. But the positioning sensory apparatus in the
mammalian inner ear depends on gravity to work; without the gravitational
guide, those sensors misread what’s happening. Forced to process the
conflicting information reported by the senses of vision, touch, and balance,
the brain reacts by generating feelings of nausea.
Like earthside sailors, astronauts seem to adapt eventually to the erroneous
messages sent by their inner ears. Microscopic examination of tissues from
the spacefaring rats showed that physical changes may help spacesick voyagers.
The rats’ inner ear sensors seem to grow more receptor synapses in
zero gravity. In effect, they’re compensating for weaker signals by
building better receivers.
That physiological change may be the only beneficial one astronauts can
expect. The shift in blood from legs to chest, for example, seems to suppress
production of both reed and white blood cells, which could impair the immune
system. Without gravity’s encouragement, bones begin to demineralize;
astronauts undergo a kind of hastened osteoporosis. And kidneys change in
space, filtering at a faster rate while the plasma flow decreases. That
means kidney stones could become a common ailment on long space voyages.
For the medical researchers, one of the most interesting results of their
studies was something that didn’t change in space. Air collects at
the top of lungs, while more blood is concentrated in their lower portions,
and scientists assumed that gravity played an important role in producing
that pattern. But the same imbalance continued in space, which means that
lung physiology isn’t as well understood as everyone thought.
The NASA life scientists are concerned enough about their findings to suggest that artificial gravity should be a feature of any manned Mars flight. Cynics think it would be far less expensive to stick with robot-manned flight—though other life forms could go along. Those 2000 jellyfish, for example, didn’t seem to miss gravity at all.